SignalStack
Volver a noticias

DeepMind reveals Gemini Robotics 2.5 and open safety benchmark "ASIMOV-jailbreak"

Leer original

Resumen con IA

DeepMind’s Gemini Robotics 2.5 advances AI toward human-level factory performance, while its new open safety benchmark addresses critical risks of robots working alongside humans.

Resumen generado con IA. Consulta el original para comprobar el contexto y la precisión.

Extracto de la fuente

Este es el extracto disponible del feed. Puede estar abreviado o en el idioma original.

Google DeepMind has revealed a new generation of the AI-powered Gemini Robotics platform. In the 2.5 release, Google says its robotic AI is getting tantalizingly close to completing real-world tasks as well as humans do. In fact, some Gemini robots were able to get actual work done in Mercedes-Benz factories, and the team is preparing for a day when robots operate alongside humans with an open source safety benchmark. DeepMind's physical AI platform has several computational layers between user input and robotic action. There's the vision-language model piece, which is Gemini Embodied Reasoning. Essentially, it takes your instructions and uses live video to plan how the robot can accomplish the task. The other main component is the vision-language-action (VLA) that actually generates robot actions, like moving an actuator—that's Gemini Robotics, which has been bumped to version 2.5. DeepMind says that Gemini Robotics 2.5 is much better at tasks that require a high degree of dexterity. The model was evaluated across more than 200 activities, including serving food with tongs and using a pipette, as you would see in a laboratory. Google also showed that Apptronik’s Apollo 2 humanoid robot with Gemini Robotics 2.5 can now tie a bow with its five-fingered hands, a notable feat, because deformable objects (like ribbon) are notoriously difficult for robots to manipulate.Read full article Comments

Sobre la prioridad

Una ayuda automática para ordenar, basada en fuentes, palabras clave y entidades, en una escala de 1–12. Alta: 9–12; media: 6–8; baja: 1–5. No mide urgencia, verifica noticias ni representa respaldo editorial.

Más sobre este tema