The UK government is extending Palantir’s controversial NHS contract to ensure continuity while developing a domestic alternative, balancing immediate operational needs against political pressure for technological sovereignty.
AI-generated summary. Check the original reporting for context and accuracy.
Source excerpt
This is the available feed excerpt, which may be shortened or in the publisher’s original language.
Health secretary Yvette Cooper has faced calls to axe US tech firm’s contract to deliver the flagship government AI system, report saysPalantir’s controversial £330m health contract is to be extended before ministers draw up plans to replace it with a British alternative, the FT has reported.Health secretary Yvette Cooper has faced calls from MPs and campaigners to axe the US tech firm’s contract to deliver the flagship government AI system.The reports today that Labour is to keep Palantir in the NHS shows that the huge sums of money paid to the likes of former Labour ministers, Peter Mandelson and Tom Watson, looks to have paid off.Any evidence of patient benefit is highly contested by NHS staff and many NHS trusts have rejected the use of Palantir’s platform.The benefits of smart glasses must be weighed against the harms they can cause. The government is already looking into options to restrict smart glasses in certain settings and restricting the sale to certain users.Other settings, such as healthcare and education, have existing safeguarding or professional policies that are relevant to smart glasses and any kind of digital recording. NHS England and the Department for Education are currently looking into wearable technology in certain settings as well.Women are reporting waking up after nights out to find videos of themselves have gone viral online, filmed without their knowledge or consent by men wearing smart glasses.To me, these devices not only have the potential to erode safety and privacy in public spaces, but raise really important questions about consent. Continue reading...
About priority
An automated sorting aid based on source trust, keywords, and entities, on a scale of 1–12. High: 9–12; medium: 6–8; low: 1–5. It does not measure urgency, verify reporting, or indicate editorial endorsement.
Europeans support climate action but reject costly measures like fuel levies, revealing a demand for effective policies that minimize personal financial sacrifice.