বিল গেটস সতর্ক করছেন যে সমাজকে দুই দশকের বিশৃঙ্খল এআই বিঘ্নের জন্য প্রস্তুত হতে হবে, এবং জোর দিচ্ছেন যে তৎক্ষণাত সিদ্ধান্তগুলো এই অশান্ত প্রযুক্তিগত পরিবর্তনকে মোকাবেলা করার জন্য গুরুত্বপূর্ণ।
এআই দিয়ে তৈরি সারাংশ। প্রেক্ষাপট ও নির্ভুলতার জন্য মূল প্রতিবেদন দেখুন।
উৎসের অংশবিশেষ
এটি ফিডে পাওয়া অংশবিশেষ। এটি সংক্ষিপ্ত বা প্রকাশকের মূল ভাষায় হতে পারে।
Today, I’m talking to Bill Gates, cofounder and former CEO of Microsoft and chairman of the Gates Foundation. You may have noticed Bill in the news more lately — he’s been on something of a tour for the past few months, ever since publishing an essay in late August titled “The turbulent AI era is here. The choices we make now are critical.” In his piece, Gates ratcheted up his rhetoric around AI safety, writing that “even under the best circumstances, the transition to this new AI era will be one of the most turbulent times in human history.” In interviews since, Gates has called AI “the most dangerous thing that humans have ever gone near,” and that AI “makes nuclear weapons look like nothing.” It is clear he does not think the current policy response from the White House, or the lack of coordinated efforts from the AI industry itself, is sufficient to combat this threat. Verge subscribers, don’t forget you get exclusive access to ad-free Decoder wherever you get your podcasts. Head here. Not a subscriber? You can sign up here. So I wanted to know: Is Bill Gates an AI doomer? I also had a series of questions downstream from what he’s been arguing about AI. How can we ever hope to control AI, and align it to humanity, if we can’t even agree on what it is and whether it’s conscious? How would you even technically construct a solution to alignment that could be enforced, not just for closed-source models but open-source ones, too? Bill gave us a big chunk of his time to dig into these issues with him, and the resulting conversation is a really illuminating one. He thinks we need to prepare for roughly two decades of AI disruption, and he says this period could be so painful it might split society in two — between people comfortable living near the technological frontier, and those who reject it. We also talked about the labor considerations, the nihilism of younger generations toward technological progress, and what should make us hopeful about the future. Thi
অগ্রাধিকার সম্পর্কে
উৎসের বিশ্বাসযোগ্যতা, শব্দ ও সত্তার ভিত্তিতে ১–১২ স্কেলে স্বয়ংক্রিয়ভাবে সাজানোর সহায়ক। উচ্চ: ৯–১২; মাঝারি: ৬–৮; নিম্ন: ১–৫। এটি জরুরিতা বা খবরের সত্যতা নির্ধারণ করে না এবং সম্পাদকীয় অনুমোদন নয়।