SignalStack
খবরে ফিরে যান

Cleaning up PFAS

মূল প্রতিবেদন পড়ুন

সারাংশ

সারাংশ এখনও পাওয়া যায়নি। নিচের মূল প্রতিবেদন পড়ুন।

উৎসের অংশবিশেষ

এটি ফিডে পাওয়া অংশবিশেষ। এটি সংক্ষিপ্ত বা প্রকাশকের মূল ভাষায় হতে পারে।

Scrubbing Earth of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances—a.k.a. PFAS or forever chemicals—could eliminate a list of woes for people and planet. Used for decades in everything from nonstick pans to firefighting foams, PFAS have been linked to increased risks of fertility challenges, developmental delays, cancer, and reduced immune response. They are known for a strong bond between carbon and fluorine, which the environment struggles to break down. The sticking points PFAS are everywhere: They spew from factories and slough off products and into water with normal use. Scientists have found them in everything from human blood to Antarctic snow. One 2022 report found that 89% of the US population had PFAS in excess of two nanograms per milliliter of blood plasma, a common threshold for potential adverse health effects, and 9% of the population had passed the riskier level of 20 nanograms per milliliter. The PFAS monster is also a moving target. New compounds are still being created and used. There are more than 12,000 of them, and much of the cleanup research focuses on only a small handful. The progress Cleansing PFAS-contaminated soil is a project in its infancy, but it is possible to prevent more buildup by pulling the chemicals out of water systems. There are two ways to handle this: trap or destroy. Some scientists have found reverse osmosis—a process that pushes water through supertight filters—useful in point-of-use cases, like water filters at kitchen sinks. Other techniques in the pipeline might be more suitable for large-scale removal—for example, at water treatment facilities. One, called foam fractionation, generates bubbles that capture PFAS. More approaches, like ensnaring the chemicals in nanothin layers of charged metal, are also under investigation. Trapping, though, is imperfect. You’re left with PFAS-filled brine, which if not properly destroyed (an expensive and energy-sucking endeavor) can still end up in the environment. Jack Huang, a pr

অগ্রাধিকার সম্পর্কে

উৎসের বিশ্বাসযোগ্যতা, শব্দ ও সত্তার ভিত্তিতে ১–১২ স্কেলে স্বয়ংক্রিয়ভাবে সাজানোর সহায়ক। উচ্চ: ৯–১২; মাঝারি: ৬–৮; নিম্ন: ১–৫। এটি জরুরিতা বা খবরের সত্যতা নির্ধারণ করে না এবং সম্পাদকীয় অনুমোদন নয়।

এই বিষয়ের আরও খবর